Thursday 5 July 2012

Society gone insane

It's not often that I get a bee in my bonnet, politically speaking, but this has really got my goat...

Insurance millionaire Theodore Agnew has donated enough money to a school in Great Yarmouth to enable the school's year five and year six students to stay at school until 6pm every weekday (and when I said 'enable' - it's not an optional after-school club - it's timetabled education for every student).  Not only that, but after October, the plan is for years three and four to join in as well - that's a 9-hour working day for a seven-year old (leaving them too exhausted to concentrate, and with barely enough time to eat tea before going to bed once they get home from school every day)!  Read the story here.  Michael Gove, this country's Education Secretary (who has never been a teacher, nor does he have children of his own, from what I can make out) has said this is a "brilliant idea"!!!  I was temporarily rendered speechless by the sheer scale of this insanity.  However, the speechlessness has worn off, so I figure "it's my blog and I'll rant if I want to"

What on earth is our society coming to?  I mean, ok - not everyone has the ability or the desire to home educate.  There are two types of parents apparently - those who breathe a sigh of relief when the school holidays are over and the children go back to school, and those (most home educators fit here) who miss their children while they're not at home.  I'm definitely the latter, but I'm not passing judgement on the former type: it doesn't make me a better or worse parent - just a different one.   But I think we all agree that children need their families.  In most cases it's true that both parents need to work so they can afford the cost of living, and obviously most families arrange that so that the working hours of at least one parent fall inside school hours - not least because the cost of after-school care is extortionate, but also because as parents who love our children we know it's good for our children's sense of security and well-being to have time chatting with them about their day, helping them with homework, sharing a nutritious meal around the table, even - dare I say it - playing with them.  And all I remember from our own school days was how frantic it all was, trying to fit it into the couple of hours I did have with them between the school-run and bedtime.  Yet somehow Mr Agnew, Mr Gove and Mr Holledge (the headmaster at the school concerned) are all patting themselves on the back for providing a way for children to spend even more time away from their families!  Michael Gove was quoted as saying, "It also helps parents, actually, making it easier for them to get promoted at work or move jobs in the town".  How did our society ever get to the place where promotion was more important than family values?  Have none of them ever heard of the famous quote, "On their deathbed, no one ever said, 'I wish I had spent more time with my business.'."  The reasoning behind this quote is that we all know what matters far, far more than success in business is building strong family relationships, raising our children to be stable, well-rounded members of society.  Research has repeatedly shown this to be so - a good example of this being the article, A Wise Investment: Benefits From Families Spending Time Together.  Some, but not all, of the points raised cite sharing 'religious activities' together as being beneficial, but even if that doesn't apply to you (and I doubt it would impress Messrs Gove et al), the other points are still really pertinent.  I was particularly drawn to the fourth point: "Children’s academic success is associated with having mothers who frequently communicated with them."  That's mothers - not teachers or even well-meaning headmasters!!!  Academic success is not down to children being segregated from their families and kept at school for longer hours so they can have horse-riding lessons!
This ludicrous scheme is apparently being so well-received because of the poverty of the area that the school is in.  These supposedly educated men think that by taking already deprived children away from their families for even longer hours every day, they are somehow going to give them a better future.  (For those of you who are wondering, yes I know there are some poor families where neglect and abuse mean that the child is deprived of the kind of family support that I'm talking about - but there are also some wealthy families where the same can be said - and anyway, that's a matter for the welfare system, not the education system.)  As a society we need to be pouring money into building families, not giving them more reasons to spend time apart!  David Cameron said he was going to invest in families as the "building blocks of a strong, cohesive society".  Well, tell that to the Education Secretary!!!  If we're serious about investing in familes, and we have parents who are so poor that they have to work a nine-hour day in order to survive, we need to be looking at better ways to support them in the family - and that's not by treating the children as a problem to be removed so that the parents can earn more money.  Children need time at home with family - they do not need a 45-hour working week!!!

Rant over - for now ;)

11 comments:

  1. I'm very sorry to say that I think this move will be very popular with working parents who will see it as free childcare. Their children will already not be going home after school, but to an after school club or a childminder.I'm aware some have no choice. I do think however that our society has gradually shifted to the point that everything is geared towards the needs of the parents and not the child. Parents have been deskilled and many now truly believe that what is good for them must be good for the child. Very sad for the children, very sad for parents in the end.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree: I'm sad for those who feel they have no alternative but I'm even more sad that we as a society have eroded family values to the point where many people will think this is a good idea :(

      Delete
  2. I used to do a 37.5 hour week when i worked and that was plenty for me as an adult!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Precisely! It's just far too long for a child to be away from their home :(

      Delete
  3. Nice blog & lovely to meet a new, enthusiastic home edder!

    Can only agree with all you have said & shake my head for the poor kids who will be subjected to this... It is indeed a mad world!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you - for commenting and encouraging - it's always nice to make a new friend in this mad world

      Delete
  4. Gosh this is so awful. Having spent many years as a teacher of 7-13 year olds and then becoming a stay at home mum and then for a few years when my children were in school volunteering in class every day and being a governor, to now home educating - I've seen much. It saddened me when breakfast clubs started, because for most of those children, they also attended after school club (that wasn't actually clubs but a creche) those children had an 8 to 6 day, four or five days a week. They was no quality or learning (educational or personal)in the breakfast or after school - just occupation of time. And, i believe, many inappropriate behaviours stemmed from here where the quality of the adult was questionable. There's some truly amazing individuals, especially those who interact and play with children and engage and stimulate them - but lets not lie ourselves that there's one at every establishment - you only have to look at a usual rate of turnover of lunchtime supervisors and these creche staff and the difficulty schools have in replacements, to know that those brilliant individuals are not common. How terrible that this is seen as positive.
    Rant over.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Marnie, I totally get where you're coming from! Our lodger works at an after-school club, and although she is one of the fab ones (naturally), some of the things she tells us about her job are really bad. I'm more and more glad about our own choice to HE, but still terribly sad for all the families out there who get hardly any time together :(

      Delete
  5. time at school - it's quality not quantity... don't spend seven hours at school where 1.5 hours are breaks or lunch, 1/2 hour going to / from toilets, and the rest of the time with hardly any proper attention from the teacher. That's what happened to my daughter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry to hear that about your daughter Steve - I hope she's doing well now x

      Delete
  6. Thanks everyone for reading, commenting and sharing. This turned out to be easily my most popular blog post so far, which encourages me that I'm not the only one who finds it appalling. Here's hoping for success for the parents involved who are protesting against the generous but insane hike in school hours...

    ReplyDelete